<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus Stylus 9000 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/olympus-stylus-9000-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/olympus-stylus-9000-review/</link>
	<description>Digital camera reviews, photography news and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Szylwin</title>
		<link>http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/olympus-stylus-9000-review/comment-page-1/#comment-9922</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Szylwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dpinterface.com/?p=527#comment-9922</guid>
		<description>I own this camera, along with several others.  The Stylus 9000 does have a great zoom and is well made.  The picture quality is ok but not great.  At current prices the camera is a definite buy!  If you are a casual photographer, this camera may be for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own this camera, along with several others.  The Stylus 9000 does have a great zoom and is well made.  The picture quality is ok but not great.  At current prices the camera is a definite buy!  If you are a casual photographer, this camera may be for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: celso jose fussiger</title>
		<link>http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/olympus-stylus-9000-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2898</link>
		<dc:creator>celso jose fussiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dpinterface.com/?p=527#comment-2898</guid>
		<description>gostei muito da máquina por tudo o que ela oferece, além da qualidade e tradição da marca.
gostaria de saber o preço dela e onde posso adquiri-la?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gostei muito da máquina por tudo o que ela oferece, além da qualidade e tradição da marca.<br />
gostaria de saber o preço dela e onde posso adquiri-la?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/olympus-stylus-9000-review/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dpinterface.com/?p=527#comment-340</guid>
		<description>Brad:  Your observations on the performance of this camera are exceedingly accurate.  I also found problems in low illumination levels, and the anti-shake function was not very robust.  The current going price in retail locations does appear to be artifically high for a camera with this performance level, and I agree that the Sony H20 is likely to be a much more economical means of obtaining equivalent or better digital photos if you don&#039;t mind the physical package being a little larger.  Mine (9000) is going back today and I will probably replace it with a Sony or jump up to the new Pentax.  Too many gimmicky options on the Olympus and not enough fundmental photography tools to justify the expense.  I did a direct comparison of photos from the 9000 with photos from an older Sony Cybershot (vintage 2004), and the &quot;average&quot; scene and group photos from the Cybershot were actually more esthetically pleasing.  Sad, but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad:  Your observations on the performance of this camera are exceedingly accurate.  I also found problems in low illumination levels, and the anti-shake function was not very robust.  The current going price in retail locations does appear to be artifically high for a camera with this performance level, and I agree that the Sony H20 is likely to be a much more economical means of obtaining equivalent or better digital photos if you don&#8217;t mind the physical package being a little larger.  Mine (9000) is going back today and I will probably replace it with a Sony or jump up to the new Pentax.  Too many gimmicky options on the Olympus and not enough fundmental photography tools to justify the expense.  I did a direct comparison of photos from the 9000 with photos from an older Sony Cybershot (vintage 2004), and the &#8220;average&#8221; scene and group photos from the Cybershot were actually more esthetically pleasing.  Sad, but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/olympus-stylus-9000-review/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dpinterface.com/?p=527#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Hi Leo, the cameras I was referring to were the Canon SX200, Panasonic ZS3/TZ7 and Sony H20 - they either have similar/more zoom with better image quality and feature sets. These cameras compete directly with the Stylus 9000 (that&#039;s why they&#039;re there in the size and battery life comparisons at the beginning of the review) and I believe they offer better performance-vs-price value than this camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Leo, the cameras I was referring to were the Canon SX200, Panasonic ZS3/TZ7 and Sony H20 &#8211; they either have similar/more zoom with better image quality and feature sets. These cameras compete directly with the Stylus 9000 (that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re there in the size and battery life comparisons at the beginning of the review) and I believe they offer better performance-vs-price value than this camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/olympus-stylus-9000-review/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dpinterface.com/?p=527#comment-302</guid>
		<description>In the end, your review states &quot;other compact super-zoom cameras which sell around the same price, if not slightly higher, and are well worth a look.&quot;

Which are the ones you would recommend looking into?  I am replacing my Canon PowerShot SD1000 which stopped functioning all of a sudden.  I would like to get a good optical zoom, since I take photos of people, landscapes, and wildlife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, your review states &#8220;other compact super-zoom cameras which sell around the same price, if not slightly higher, and are well worth a look.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which are the ones you would recommend looking into?  I am replacing my Canon PowerShot SD1000 which stopped functioning all of a sudden.  I would like to get a good optical zoom, since I take photos of people, landscapes, and wildlife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

