<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon Coolpix L100 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/nikon-coolpix-l100-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/nikon-coolpix-l100-review/</link>
	<description>Digital camera reviews, photography news and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grateful11</title>
		<link>http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/nikon-coolpix-l100-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3063</link>
		<dc:creator>Grateful11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dpinterface.com/?p=759#comment-3063</guid>
		<description>I sure hope they&#039;ve made improvements to the new L110 because I really liked the size and feel of the L100 but the image quality is mediocre at best, the video is worse than a $90 Nikon L18. I so much wanted to like the L100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope they&#8217;ve made improvements to the new L110 because I really liked the size and feel of the L100 but the image quality is mediocre at best, the video is worse than a $90 Nikon L18. I so much wanted to like the L100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico</title>
		<link>http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/nikon-coolpix-l100-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3058</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dpinterface.com/?p=759#comment-3058</guid>
		<description>I bought this camera last year. I had it for a week when it drove me crazy.
The quality of pictures isn&#039;t good for my taste. The camera is very slow indoor and taking pictures of playing kids (indoor) results in blurry ghost-ish pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this camera last year. I had it for a week when it drove me crazy.<br />
The quality of pictures isn&#8217;t good for my taste. The camera is very slow indoor and taking pictures of playing kids (indoor) results in blurry ghost-ish pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grateful11</title>
		<link>http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/nikon-coolpix-l100-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2048</link>
		<dc:creator>Grateful11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dpinterface.com/?p=759#comment-2048</guid>
		<description>I had this camera for about 2 weeks and wound up returning it to Staples after shooting several hundred shots. The IQ of the L100 is terrible.  My 9yo Sony Mavica CD1000 with 10x zoom has a much better IQ, I have side-by-side comparisons to prove it.  I&#039;m not sure how this camera made to the market. I ended up with a Canon SX10, excellent IQ but it eats batteries like there&#039;s no tomorrow.  Nothing&#039;s perfect like they say.  I was really hoping for great things with the L100, I loved the way it felt in my hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had this camera for about 2 weeks and wound up returning it to Staples after shooting several hundred shots. The IQ of the L100 is terrible.  My 9yo Sony Mavica CD1000 with 10x zoom has a much better IQ, I have side-by-side comparisons to prove it.  I&#8217;m not sure how this camera made to the market. I ended up with a Canon SX10, excellent IQ but it eats batteries like there&#8217;s no tomorrow.  Nothing&#8217;s perfect like they say.  I was really hoping for great things with the L100, I loved the way it felt in my hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

