http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/high-iso-canon-eos-1d-mark-iv/ Digital camera reviews, photography news and more. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:40:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/high-iso-canon-eos-1d-mark-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-1062 Brad Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:44:59 +0000 http://dpinterface.com/?p=1262#comment-1062 Hmm, I would probably disagree with that. 16 mp on APS-H looks pretty good actually and people are liking (or liked, now that they've been removed) the 1D 4's output based on what I've read around the net. I guess Canon had other better reasons for the takedown, maybe because they wanted shooters and photographers to wait in suspense until the 1D4 hits store shelves later this year. Well, as usual, I would advise waiting until a final, production camera gets reviewed to make your final thoughts/conclusion on comparing cameras. Hmm, I would probably disagree with that. 16 mp on APS-H looks pretty good actually and people are liking (or liked, now that they’ve been removed) the 1D 4′s output based on what I’ve read around the net. I guess Canon had other better reasons for the takedown, maybe because they wanted shooters and photographers to wait in suspense until the 1D4 hits store shelves later this year. Well, as usual, I would advise waiting until a final, production camera gets reviewed to make your final thoughts/conclusion on comparing cameras.

]]> http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/high-iso-canon-eos-1d-mark-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-1061 IShootBoth-C&N Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:15:05 +0000 http://dpinterface.com/?p=1262#comment-1061 Uh-oh! I guess someone compared these files to those from an old D3. FX + 12.1mp = good. APS-H + 16mp = probably not so good. Uh-oh! I guess someone compared these files to those from an old D3. FX + 12.1mp = good. APS-H + 16mp = probably not so good.

]]> http://dpinterface.com/camera-reviews/high-iso-canon-eos-1d-mark-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-1059 Mr Photo Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:55:31 +0000 http://dpinterface.com/?p=1262#comment-1059 Aw, that's too bad! Aw, that’s too bad!

]]>